BUG BOUNTYFIELD MANUAL
Vulnerability reference
Markdown
0 / 5 checkedChecks last until this page reloads.

Boot or recovery path executes an unverified component

A reachable boot path omits an authenticity check required by the product’s execution trust model.

Candidate CWE: CWE-345

Test hypothesis#

Map normal and recovery stages in matching source/configuration; compare authentic and harmless altered component fixtures using the documented local verifier or emulator. Confirm where execution is gated.

Evidence required#

Exact chip revision, production security configuration, component trust relationships and faithfully observed bypass stage.

Rule out false positives#

Secure boot disabled on an intentionally open development board or a simulator that omits hardware verification is not production bypass proof.

Playbook and command references#

Find the associated command snippets

Referenced by these target playbooks#

Report checklist#

  • Capture the affected version, configuration, identities, and object ownership.
  • Preserve a valid baseline and a negative control.
  • Reproduce the forbidden data access, action, or state change on controlled fixtures.
  • Explain the intended security rule and why the observed behavior violates it.
  • State prerequisites, uncertainty, cleanup, and the smallest demonstrated impact.

Conditional ATT&CK mapping#

  • T1542.001 · Pre-OS Boot: System Firmware — Only if: A lab demonstration modifies system firmware, such as BIOS/UEFI, to maintain execution/access across boot; record the firmware component, persistence behavior, and recovery procedure. Not established by: Downloading firmware, finding an embedded password, or detecting missing signature checks alone is not firmware persistence. Ordinary application firmware packaging needs component-level analysis.
  • T1542.002 · Pre-OS Boot: Component Firmware — Only if: A controlled reproduction modifies peripheral/component firmware to preserve execution or access outside the main OS/system firmware, with evidence of that persistence. Not established by: A firmware binary containing a vulnerable library is insufficient. Do not treat every IoT firmware issue as either system firmware or component firmware persistence.

Primary references#

Back to the complete vulnerability catalog