BUG BOUNTYFIELD MANUAL
Vulnerability reference
Markdown
0 / 5 checkedChecks last until this page reloads.

Authentic integration event applied to the wrong tenant or object

A valid provider event is misbound to a local tenant, installation, mode or resource the event is not authorized to modify.

Candidate CWE: CWE-863

Test hypothesis#

Use two controlled provider accounts/installations and local tenants. Deliver valid sandbox events through their normal route and compare trusted account mapping with any user-controlled routing metadata. Inspect a single reversible effect on the other controlled tenant.

Evidence required#

Signature verification result, authenticated provider identity, local mapping, attacker-controlled input, before/after state, and why the event lacks authority for the affected object. A valid signature alone is not the ownership check.

Rule out false positives#

An administrator deliberately sharing one integration across tenants, an intended account-wide event, or a mock event whose meaningful fields the real attacker cannot control is not a demonstrated cross-tenant flaw.

Playbook and command references#

Find the associated command snippets

Referenced by these target playbooks#

Report checklist#

  • Capture the affected version, configuration, identities, and object ownership.
  • Preserve a valid baseline and a negative control.
  • Reproduce the forbidden data access, action, or state change on controlled fixtures.
  • Explain the intended security rule and why the observed behavior violates it.
  • State prerequisites, uncertainty, cleanup, and the smallest demonstrated impact.

Conditional ATT&CK mapping#

No direct ATT&CK mapping selected. Record the weakness and demonstrated impact without forcing an adversary-behavior classification. See the mapping guide.

Primary references#

Back to the complete vulnerability catalog